Tuesday, October 23, 2007


Unless you are very young, you remember the now infamous declaration by President Bill Clinton “I did not have sex with that woman.” Then there was the stained dress, and everyone said “but you did!” His reply was that “sex”, where he was from, meant intercourse and he did not have sex with that woman. The public was outraged! Liar! Liar! Impeach!

Today we find ourselves arguing over another definition, although framing the argument seems to be difficult because there is so much that is not known (even though we are talking about entities that can profoundly impact our economy). The definition in question is “value.” How much are the assets in those SIV things worth. This is a critical issue because if they are worth say 50, then the owner SIV would have to sell them. If they are worth 95, then they do not need to sell them or, if they do, they can sell them to this “super-siv” or M-LEC thing you’ve been hearing about ($80 billion bank fund) without any really bad repercussions for the banks. Rather than get into the details about what happens if the value is on the low side, lets just say it could cause the banks and, unfortunately, our economy some significant pain because it could trigger a massive de-leveraging. (Of course there will be some who are impacted little by this, and you can find a really good piece about that written by Ben Stein here: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/21/business/21every.html?ex=1350619200&en=bfe48f041e1a9aaf&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink). Such an event could easily lead to a pretty bad recession.

So what do we do about this? We morph the definition of value. Now, the people in charge of determining the value of these assets in question are not just people off the street. These are exceptionally smart people who have developed these SIV things using all kinds of mathematical models based on quantitative methods and such. I believe they know exactly what the assets are worth if they tried to sell them today, and accepting that value could trigger a very destructive de-leveraging. But they argue that value can be defined differently. What if we define value as what these assets may be worth if we wait for a really long time by selling them to a big daddy SIV (at, oh, lets say a value of 98), bring down interest rates (which causes the value of interest-bearing securities to rise – here is our inflation problem too), and hope that these assets pay out over time more than they are worth today? Hey, I like that definition! 98 it is! Who wants a recession anyway? “I did not hide the value of that SIV!” (Liar! Liar!)

In the words of William Poole, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis:

“I think the big uncertainty right now has to do with the subprime paper: the extent to which there are owners that are potentially really stressed and are going to be forced to sell, how strong are their positions, to what extent can they gain financing from other sources so that they don’t have to dump assets,” Mr. Poole said. “They may be convinced that this paper is worth 60 cents on the dollar and they don’t want to be forced to sell it at 30 cents on the dollar. I really don’t know very much about that, and I suspect that a lot of the people even who run these funds, whose businesses run these funds, don’t know exactly where they stand on that and are out there trying to figure out what to do.”
From The Wall Street Journal Online Edition here: http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2007/10/22/poole-sees-improvement-but-says-contagion-threat-remains/#comment-5676 .

Sounds like a lot of confusion for the President of one of our Federal Reserve Banks, especially when you consider that this all gets back to the sufficiency of bank capital in our financial system. Those "people even who run these funds," aren't those the major financial institutions regulated by the FED?

Sphere: Related Content


Lawrence D. Loeb said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lawrence D. Loeb said...

Sex with a sieve (or SIV)? Sounds painful.

The interesting thing about SIVs is that their balance sheets, investments, and capitalization are not reported anywhere (except, perhaps as mentions in the notes of some financial institutions).

M-LEC hasn't even been created yet, so there we have a great deal of speculation of what it will be (should it, ultimately, be created).

Given the tremendous lack of information, there is plenty of room to speculate.

The only parties who know what assets are in the SIVs (or other conduit structures) are the managers, the investors, and the rating agencies. Those are also the only parties who know for sure how much of the balance sheet was funded with commercial paper versus medium term notes and other capital.

There have been a number of pundits, Ben Stein included (he was great in Ferris Bueller), that have made the great leap to make statements and judgements for which there is little or no evidence.

SIVs, for the most part, are in trouble because of the mismatch in duration of liabilities and assets. The lack of confidence in the underlying assets in certain SIVs has made rolling over the short-term debt that funds them problematic - hence M-LEC and other attempts to prevent the wholesale dumping of SIV assets to cover their liabilities.

The SIVs and conduits invested in securities that, for the most part, are opaque. There are CDOs that own CDOs that own CDOs that are in these portfolios. Those CDOs have a variety of exposures and a variety of ratings, but the overlap of positions make them extremely complex to value.

In general, all security valuations, whether for bonds, stocks, or derivatives, are based on a calculation that discounts potential future cash flows on a risk adjusted basis. Derivative models use complex mathematics to calculate the expected cash flows and the risk adjusted rate, resulting in a calculated value.

At present, the overlapping portfolios, together with the uncertainty of the quality of the underlying assets in those portfolios, make a significant part of the "science" aspect of valuation useless. This leaves the "art" part (which is always present through the assumptions that are put into the model).

I believe that you, Mark, are doing the best you can to identify and pass along the best information on these issues that you can. We all need to recognize that any definitive statements, given the level of uncertainty, are wholly dependent on the assumptions that the writer is making. In the case of SIVs and conduits there is a wide range of assumptions and we'll just need to see how things play out.

I've been writing (using my assumptions) about these issues on my blog, blog.lawrencedloeb.com, . I've even added an amusing video (from YouTube) that makes fun of what's going on.

Anonymous said...

Its interesting to note that CountryWide Financial yesterday decided to re-structure almost 17 billion in sub prime loans. They realize it makes more sense to extend better terms to their clients than to have them actually default on their loans, the majority of which are with terms that make it easy to fall behind.

Palermo's Blog said...

Matt - yes, and some of those loans will now be FHA, that is, taxpayer guaranteed. I hope someone is checking the paperwork.

Anonymous said...

Hello !.
might , probably curious to know how one can make real money .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may commense to get income with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you need
The company represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with affiliates around the world.
Do you want to become really rich in short time?
That`s your choice That`s what you wish in the long run!

I`m happy and lucky, I started to get income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to choose a proper partner who uses your money in a right way - that`s the AimTrust!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!
It`s easy to join , just click this link http://acivemal.lookseekpages.com/epuzuba.html
and lucky you`re! Let`s take our chance together to become rich

Anonymous said...

You may probably be very interested to know how one can manage to receive high yields on investments.
There is no need to invest much at first.
You may commense to get income with a money that usually is spent
on daily food, that's 20-100 dollars.
I have been participating in one company's work for several years,
and I'm ready to let you know my secrets at my blog.

Please visit my pages and send me private message to get the info.

P.S. I make 1000-2000 per day now.

http://theinvestblog.com [url=http://theinvestblog.com]Online Investment Blog[/url]